Skip to main content

Death Before Honor


Death Before Honor

Many people know about the last surviving Iwo Jima Medal of Honor recipient, former USMC Cpl. Hershel “Woody” Williams. What few people realize, is that Williams almost murdered one of his Marines on Iwo Jima. Had he gone through with it, we would most likely not be discussing him today. 

The day after Williams performed the actions that resulted in his receiving the Medal of Honor, he moved his squad to Hill 283, which was in the middle of Iwo Jima. On 24 February 1945, he was ordered to dig in north of this position in preparation for attacking the second airfield. 

When he told his men to move out, one of them, USMC Pvt. Thomas E. Scrivens, refused. Williams yelled, “Come on Scrivens, get moving.” Scrivens said he could not. As Williams tells it, he became disgusted and lost his ability to be “rational, considerate and compassionate.” Seeing a Marine break down and refuse to keep fighting alongside his brothers infuriated Williams. 

He put his M-1 rifle to his shoulder and said, “Scrivens, I mean it. If you don’t get moving, I’ll shoot you myself.” Scrivens realized Williams would not let him drift behind the lines when his squad needed him, so he decided he could advance after all. 

When I interviewed him, Williams said he was so angry at the time, he would have shot Scrivens had he not taken his place beside his comrades. No one really knows what would have happened if Scrivens had not obeyed. If Williams believed Scrivens was unable to carry on due to combat fatigue, Williams might have sent Scrivens back for treatment. 

Iwo Jima survivor John Lauriello saw many such cases when he was a radioman behind the lines. He said they “had a frantic look in their eyes as if they were being chased by the devil.” 

USMC Correspondent Sgt. Dick Dashiell wrote: “One of the worst sights: The pitiful shellshock cases. They look like whipped dogs.” If Williams thought Scrivens was able to obey, but chose not to, he could have written Scrivens up for disobeying a lawful order, which could have meant some minor, non-judicial punishment by his commanding officer or even referral to a court-martial where Scrivens, if found guilty, would have faced a fine, reduction in rank, or even brig (military jail) time. Scrivens was entitled to consideration of the extenuating and mitigating circumstances, including his prior combat record as well as the stress of being in some of the toughest fighting for days with little rest. 

Ironically, Scrivens was removed from combat on 1 March due to “shell-shock/combat fatigue.” Williams had kept him in the game for a few more days, but eventually, Scrivens succumbed to the strain. The entire incident became little more than a story told to fellow veterans.
If he had shot Scrivens, Williams would have been in a world of trouble and faced serious charges at a court-martial. While the Axis powers and the Soviet Union lacked respect for justice, and the Imperial Japanese Army was known to behead deserters, America took the issues of due process and the rule of law seriously. 

Disobedience of a superior’s lawful order or deserting one’s duty in battle were general court-martial felony offenses in the Articles for the Government of the U.S. Navy (called “Rocks and Shoals”) applicable to Sailors and Marines. A properly convened court-martial could impose a sentence of a fine, reduction in rank, imprisonment, or even the death penalty for one found guilty. 

Williams, as a squad leader, had no authority to be judge, jury and executioner, and everyone was taught that at boot camp. Even minor punishment (no more than 20 days confinement) required action by a commissioned officer who was entitled to order a general or special court-martial. 

Even a summary court-martial, which could sentence an enlisted defendant to no more than two months in the brig and could order a man discharged, required a trial before three qualified officers with a court reporter, and gave the defendant an automatic appellate review after the trial. Williams had been taught that Scrivens, for disobeying an order could be “reduced [in rank]. Two years confinement, dishonorable discharge, and other accessories of sentence…” according to the legal education he got at Boot Camp in San Diego.

 Williams may not have remembered the exact consequence of disobedience, but he was taught that it typically entailed dire repercussions. 
On the other hand, if someone was suffering from combat fatigue or was somehow mentally or physically unable to carry out an order, that was a valid defense and charges should not be referred to a court-martial. 

Post-traumatic stress disorder afflicted at least 2,700 Marines on Iwo Jima who were removed from combat due to Shell-Shock/Combat Fatigue. This was not a system that allowed capricious, summary executions by a low-ranking NCO or condoned drum-head courts, but rather a system that guaranteed the accused a speedy and fair trial and looked after the afflicted. 

When Williams acted as he did, he was treading on thin ice. As it turned out, Scrivens and Williams were both able to fight and continued to make a contribution and to finish out 24 February with honor. 
War places so much stress on combatants they do things they later regret when they have time to reflect. In 1957, Scrivens went to Williams to apologize and asked, “Do you think you really would’ve shot me?” 
Williams answered, “Yes, I would’ve.” He said he would react differently as a mature adult, knowing all he does now, but after the horror he had experienced, being stressed out and sleep deprived, a high school dropout with no medical training and no real scientific understanding of the psychological effects of extended periods of combat on the ability to continue to function, he was appalled one of his men would abandon comrades in time of need. 

Williams remembers seeing some Marines crack up and never resume fighting, but they were not going to be him or his men. The possibility he might feel similarly despair scared him. “I kept repeating to myself, ‘I’m not going to die. I’m not going to die.’ I would never let myself think that I was not going to make it. I had to get back to that girl in Fairmont who I wanted to marry.

 That is what kept me sane.” These phrases, repeated in his self-talk, motivated him to move forward and removed the icy chill from creeping into his heart to create doubt and fear. 
Holocaust survivor and noted neurologist and psychiatrist Dr. Viktor Frankl recognized this phenomenon as the psychosocial concept of logotherapy, which holds that those who find meaning in life are the most productive and can survive horrendous events.

 Those who survived Auschwitz usually did so because they looked forward to seeing a loved one, enacting revenge or writing a book. They had a reason to live. Williams’ main reason was to get back to his fiancée Ruby (or maybe his married girlfriend Eleanore Pyles—he was dating both at the same time), and that goal kept him “sane.” Marines had choices, unlike Holocaust victims; however, both groups faced death under cruel circumstances on a minute-by-minute basis. 

Frankl observed that people who face life-threatening situations condition themselves mentally for something else in order to deal with staring death in the eye. 
In the end, Williams’ rash decision to point his weapon at a Marine to force him back in line, which he had no authority to do, may have convinced Scrivens not to quit. But it also could have impelled Scrivens to report Williams to their commanding officer, resulting in Williams facing disciplinary action.

 Scrivens, had he refused to get up and fight, might have faced discipline himself for disobedience, unless he was found to be medically unfit. Had Williams shot Scrivens, he would have been court-martialed instead of awarded the Medal of Honor. Fortunately, this difficult situation did not end in tragedy; Scrivens continued fighting. Knowing Willams’ infamous short temper, Scrivens was lucky he got back on the line. 

Was Williams right to threaten Scrivens when he was on the verge of losing his nerve after difficult, dangerous and exhausting combat? Viktor Frankl cautions, “No man should judge unless he asks himself in absolute honesty whether in a similar situation he might not have done the same.” 

There is an established legal procedure in the Corps for dealing with one accused of disobeying a lawful order, desertion or another serious offense. To many, it would have been the absolutely wrong decision for Williams to have patted Scrivens on the head, told him it would be all right, and permitted him to abandon the fight. Both would have suffered for such behavior, and no military can tolerate disobedience in the face of overwhelming violence. 

However, it certainly was not right for Williams, a 21-year-old high school dropout and low-ranking NCO with no medical or legal expertise, to shoot a Marine—even if he was sure the Marine’s conduct was criminal. Neither his company first sergeant nor his company commander had the right to shoot Scrivens. Not even USMC Commandant Alexander Vandegrift or US Navy Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz had the right to shoot a Marine who had violated regulations. Scrivens was an American warrior and as such had rights.

The ability to kill without thought in the moment is a necessity for a warrior if he wants to survive. The unwillingness to kill and support one’s unit causes nations to lose wars. Williams actions against the Japanese and his willingness to threaten Scrivens shows that Marines are conditioned to zero in on the task at hand—annihilating the enemy and making sure everyone in their squad was similarly focused. 

Scrivens’ fear was understandable after what his division had been through, but so was Williams’ concern about keeping his squad in the fight. Many reached a point where they could no longer function. It was up to the authorities to determine if Scrivens was ill or had committed an offense and, if he had, what punishment within the limits of Rocks and Shoals would be imposed on him. 

Do you believe Williams was justified in his actions? What would you do in the same situation? 
To read the entire story of Woody Williams experience on Iwo Jima, see “Flamethrower”: 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The capture of brave Russian officer Rosinski

The capture of brave Russian officer Rosinski This is a shocking image and I apologize in advance for sharing it, but here’s one that truly got to me… in Belarus, 1918, after WWI had already ended, the brave Russian officer Rosinski was captured by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks tortured the captain, likely to get information out of the man, which he bravely refused to give. After that, they simply continued with the torture out of some sick sense of innate cruelty. He was ‘the enemy’ and he was at their mercy, so they brutally murdered their captive. The brave captain was emasculated. And anally impaled on a tree branch. All this while still alive. Alfred Savoir, the man who published the picture and was an eye witness to the death of the brave military officer, described "M. B.", who ordered this atrocity, thus: I knew him not long ago; he was a charming teenager with an ironic wit and joker. He was rubbed with French culture, he admired the novels of Barres and he quot...

15 Most Brutal Rape Punishments Around The World.

15 Most Brutal Rape Punishments Around The World. Rape is considered the most offensive crime in every society. Rape victims are often looked down in the society and had to suffer mental torture without any fault of her/him. This horrific impact of physical and mental assault often ruin the life of a victim. Different governments across the globe came up with strong laws against sexual assault to make their country a safer place for their citizen and to make sure no one who indulged in this heinous crime could roam free. Here are the most brutal rape punishments of different countries around the world. In China, The meritocratic leadership punishes the rapist straight away with a death sentence and in some scenarios rapist are also punished by the mutilation of their genitals. 2. Iran In Iran, the rapist is either hanged or shot to death in public. Sometimes the guilty escapes the death penalty by the premission from the victim but is still liable for 100 lashes or life imprisonm...

CLIFFORD HOYT: THE MAN WHO HAS SEEN HELL

CLIFFORD HOYT: THE MAN WHO HAS SEEN HELL I immediately make a premise. Many Paranormal groups report news similar to the one I am about to publish, about a certain Harry Hoyt, aged 31, who died in 1999 a few days after having an accident from which he woke up saying he saw Hell (and they put a scene from the movie “Hellraiser 2” as a photo). Well, what I found in my research is very different, although the common thread is the same. So it's up to you to decide which version is the right one (assuming one of the two is true). Let's go to the facts. The protagonist is Clifford Hoyt (not Harry: Harry Hyot is an American filmmaker to me), 31 who suffered serious injuries in a car accident due to icy asphalt in 1999, on his way home after a long day at work in Maryland. . He remained in a coma for a few hours and when he regained consciousness, he revealed to the nurse that he was looking after him that he had been sucked into a vortex that led him straight to Hell. He told of the p...

After Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Tragedy and Humiliation.

After Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Tragedy and Humiliation.  U.S. and Australian brutalisation of women on the Japanese mainland.   (Excerpt From Pages 66-69) All references are provided in the book itself.  “There was a far darker side to the U.S. and allied occupation of Japan, one which is little mentioned in the vast majority of histories – American or otherwise. When Japan surrendered in August 1945, mass rapes by occupying forces were expected… [despite setting up of a comfort women which recruited or otherwise trafficked desperate women to brothels] such crimes were still common and several of them were extremely brutal and resulted in the deaths of the victims. Political science professor Eiji Takemae wrote regard- ing the conduct of American soldiers occupying Japan: ‘U.S. troops comported themselves like conquerors, especially in the early weeks and months of occupation. Misbehavior ranged from black-marketeering, petty theft, reckless driving and disorderly con...

During World War II, millions of people were sent to concentration camps, including women.

During World War II, millions of people were sent to concentration camps, including women. Women in concentration camps were subjected to brutal treatment and often faced more severe conditions than their male counterparts. The conditions in the camps were inhumane, and women were often subjected to forced labor, starvation, and medical experiments. Women were treated differently in concentration camps than men. They were often separated from their families, forced to perform hard labor, and subjected to sexual abuse. Women who were pregnant were also subjected to harsh conditions and medical experimentation. Many women were killed, either as part of the genocide or because they were deemed too weak to continue working. One of the most notorious concentration camps where women were held was Auschwitz-Birkenau. There, women were subjected to forced labor, starvation, and medical experimentation. Many were killed in gas chambers or through other forms of execution. The camp was designe...

Frank Discussion Of Rape And Other Atrocities Committed During War.

WARNING! PHOTO BELOW ARE NOT MET FOR THE WEAK HEART. Please note: The following subject matter is of immense importance, but could be difficult to read. There is a Frank Discussion Of Rape And Other Atrocities Committed During War. After entering a large museum in one of the world’s most ancient cities and the former capital of the Chinese empire, Nanking—or Nanjing as it’s known today—my 18-year-old daughter Sophia and I walked over a glass walkway that allowed us to look down 10 feet of earth and observe an ancient footpath. Lights highlighted the ground under the glass while the room we were in was dark.  To our right hung numerous photographs on a black wall showing Japanese soldiers slaughtering Chinese citizens in December 1937 revealed by individual lights, the types one sees on art museum paintings. Dead babies, severed heads, piles of bodies on Yangtze River banks, and helpless prisoners of war were all documented there by photographs taken by the perpetrators themselve...

"Wooden Horse or Spanish Donkey"

"Wooden Horse or Spanish Donkey"  The wooden horse, or Spanish donkey, was an extremely painful and gruesome medieval torture device.  It was first used by the Holy Inquisition in France and then in Spain and Germany, and then migrated to the Americas, gaining prominence during the colonial period.  The main design was the same wherever it was used.  It was a triangular wooden box with a very sharp top end (ie where the horse's spine would be).  The apparatus was constructed of wood, with planks nailed together to form a long, tapered ridge, which would serve as the horse's back.  These were supported by four legs attached to a bracket, about 6 or 7 feet (1.8 to 2.1 metres) high, with wheels fitted to the bottom of the legs so that the entire device could roll across the ground.  A head and tail would be attached to make the torture device look like an almost “fun” huge wooden horse.  The defendant would be mounted on the horse, with ankle weights...

The Grabenpanzer

The Grabenpanzer The Grabenpanzer, or Sappenpanzer (trench armor), also called lobster armor, was a German-made steel fist used as personal body armor during the “Great War.” The Grabenpanzer consists of four pieces of articulated steel: a large chest plate and three other plates that cover the user's abdomen and groin. The different plates were connected with canvas straps. Each plate also had a thick felt block inside to silence the sound of steel plates hitting. The armor divided into separate parts allowed the user to be more flexible. The Grabenpanzer weighed between 9 and 11 kg depending on the model and was generally combined with a thick steel front plate for the user’s Stahlhelm (helmet), which added even more weight to the soldier. For this very reason, the Grabenpanzer was not produced for assault troops, but for machine gun teams and soldiers in sentimental service, operating in static positions, where they were highly exposed and unprotected against an enemy rifleman. ...

Masha Bruskina.

Masha Bruskina. Masha Bruskina was a Russian teenage female partisan. She was a 17 year old Jewish high school graduate and was the first teenage girl to be publicly hanged by the Nazis in Belorussia (Belarus), since the German invasion of Soviet Union on the 22nd of June 1941.  Her execution and that of the two men hanged with her took place on the 26th of October 1941 in the city of Minsk. In the photos of her, you will see that she has blond hair, but her natural colour was dark. She dyed her hair when she started to work for the underground. Witnesses to her hanging, testified that Masha struggled hard and lost control of her bladder and bowels.  After hanging for three days, she and the men were taken down and only when her body was traditionally washed before her burial by local people and members of her family, did her dark hair show up. She worked as a nurse in a military hospital and was a member of an underground cell which...

Rubin Stacey, lynched victim, hanging from a tree

Rubin Stacey, lynched victim, hanging from a tree, surrounded by onlookers, including girls, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Rubin Stacy, 37 was a homeless tenant farmer who knocked on a white woman's door (Marion Jones) – she screamed, and he was arrested.  As he was being led to jail by six deputies, a mob of about 100 overpowered them – ran their car off the road, and lynched him in sight of Marion's house, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.  Marion claimed she offered him a drink of water, but he tried to assault her with a knife, which she later recanted. A photo of the lynching was sent to President F.D.  Roosevelt to persuade him to support the Costigan-Wagner Act which would bring federal prosecution to any law enforcement officers who failed to exercise their responsibilities during a lynching incident.  - Roosevelt refused to support the bill claiming he would lose Southern votes in the next election.