Skip to main content

Burning at the stake.

 



Burning at the stake.


Heresy.


Burning at the stake in public was used in England & Wales to punish heresy for both sexes from at least 1222 to 1612 with the death of Edward Wightman, who was the last to be burnt for this crime at Lichfield in Staffordshire on the 11th of April of that year. 


It is not known when burning was first used in Britain, but there is a recorded burning for heresy in 1222, when a deacon of the church was burnt at Oxford for embracing the Jewish faith so he could marry a Jew.


In 1401, the king authorised a Statute of Heresy which gave the clergy power to arrest and try those suspected of heresy. The first to suffer under the new act was one William Sautre, a priest, who was executed at (Kings) Lynn in 1402. This statute was repealed but in 1553, burning was re-introduced by Henry VIII’s daughter, Mary Tudor ("Bloody Mary") and 274 burnings of both sexes for heresy were recorded during her five year reign (reign of terror) between 1553 and 1558. In most cases their only "crime" was following the Protestant faith.


 The normal place of execution in London being at West Smith Field (now called just Smithfield). An engraving of the period shows that these unfortunates were stood in empty tar barrels at the stake and then had faggots heaped round them. It was not the practice to strangle heretics before they were burnt so they died slow and horrible deaths - being literally burned alive.


Burning was in use throughout Europe at this time and was particularly favoured by the Spanish Inquisition as it did not involve shedding of the victim's blood, which was disallowed under the prevailing Roman Catholic doctrine, and because it ensured that the condemned had no body to take into the next life (which was believed to be a very severe punishment in itself).  It was also thought at that time that burning cleansed the soul which was considered important for those convicted of witchcraft and heresy. It is claimed that as many as 200,000 people were burned for witchcraft in Europe in 16th and 17th centuries.

Witchcraft.


Although many people might associate burning at the stake with witchcraft, it was only in Scotland that burning was the punishment for witchcraft.  In England and Wales witchcraft was an ordinary felony, punishable by hanging.  Burning was widely used for that offence in other parts of Europe - particularly France, Switzerland and the Nordic countries. 


Scotland did burn witches and there are many recorded instances of both sexes suffering this fate.  On the 18th of May 1671 Janet McMuldroche and Elspeth Thompson were strangled and burned at Dumfries.  


The following are the words of the warrant for their execution, dated two days earlier : “Forsamuch as in ane court of Justiciarie holden be us within the Tolbuithe of drumfreis vpon the fyftein day of May instant Jonet McMuldroche and Elspeth Thomsone were found guiltie be ane ascyse of the severall articles of witchcraft spe[cif]it in the verdict given againest them theiranent Were decerned and adjudged be us the Lords Commissioners of Justiciarie to be tane vpon thursday next the eighteen day of May instant Betuixt tuo and foure houres in the afernoone to the ordinare place of executione the toune of drumfreis And their to be wirried at ane stake till they be dead And theirafter their bodies to be burnt to ashes And all their moveable goods and geir to be escheat.”


Note : (wirried means strangled and escheat means confiscated)

The last person to be burned as a witch in Scotland was Janet Horne at Dornoch in Ross shire in 1727. Janet had been accused of witching her daughter to make her hands and feet grow into horses hooves, so that she could ride her. The daughter had a deformed hand, due to being “shod by the Devil”!  She was also tried but acquitted.  She later had a child who exhibited the same kind of congenital hand deformity.  A stone at the place of execution commemorates her death. The witchcraft Acts were repealed there in 1736.


High Treason and Petty Treason.

Burning was the punishment for women convicted of High Treason or Petty Treason. High Treason is a crime committed against the Sovereign or the state, Petty Treason is a crime committed against a superior, e.g. the murder of a husband or an employer. 


High Treason included such offences as counterfeiting money and "coining" (the clipping of coins for pieces of silver and gold which were melted down to produce counterfeit coins), possession of coining equipment and colouring base metal coins (to pass them off as of higher value). Oddly, men who committed these same crimes suffered just ordinary hanging having been first drawn to the place of execution on a hurdle.  Men who were convicted of high treason were hanged, drawn and quartered but this was not deemed acceptable for women as it would have involved nudity.


Until 1790, every woman convicted of counterfeiting gold or silver coin of the realm, was sentenced to be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution and there " to be burned with fire till she was dead." (Blackstone's Commentaries, 204. Ibid, 377).


  In England women who were sentenced to be burnt were allowed by law to be strangled with a rope before the fire got to them and thus died in much the same way as they would have by hanging.  In some of the later cases of burning strangling with a cord was replaced with hanging.  The stake had a hook or bracket at the top from which the woman was hanged until dead, prior to a chain being put around her waist and the faggots lit.  The report of the execution of Susannah Lott at Maidstone described this in detail.  Hanging prior to burning was also used for the last three executions at Newgate.


Elizabeth Gaunt was the last woman to be burnt for high treason in the normal sense of the word. She was executed in 1685, having been convicted of involvement in the Rye House plot. She was denied strangulation and was thus burned alive.

Different forms of burning.

Three slightly different methods of burning were used. The first, consisted of using a heap of faggots piled around a wooden stake above which the prisoner was attached with chains or iron hoops. 


The British and Spanish Inquisition preferred this method as it had the greatest visual impact.  This form of burning typically subjects the prisoner to a far more agonising death as it some time before the flames reach head level.  In most cases of treason and witchcraft the prisoner was strangled first before the fire was lit.  In Scotland the strangling formed part of the sentence for convicted witches.


The second method was to tie the condemned to the stake and heap faggots all round them, effectively hiding their sufferings, so that they died inside a wall of flames. It is probable that Joan of Arc died like this.  It is thought that this method led to a much quicker death because the victim was forced to breathe the flame and hot gasses surrounding their face.


  The heat of the air causes the lining of the trachea to swell up thus blocking the airway and leading to suffocation within a few minutes.

The third method, used in Germany and the Nordic countries, involved tying the prisoner to a near vertical ladder, the top of which was tied to a frame, and then swinging them down onto the fire. 


On the Continent, strangling before burning was also allowed, the rope being called a "retentum."  In some Nordic countries, a small barrel of gunpowder was tied to the prisoner which was meant to explode on contact with the flames, thus giving them a fairly instant death.  If they were neither strangled or blown up, they died from a combination of shock, burning of the lungs and air passages and smoke inhalation, all of which took a considerable amount of time to kill and caused extreme pain.


18th century burnings in Britain.

Between 1702 and 1734, 10 women were burned at London’s Tyburn.  Two of these were for the Petty Treason murder of their husbands, and eight for High Treason, comprising two for possession of coining equipment, four for counterfeiting and two for coining itself. 


 Barbara Spencer was burned for counterfeiting on Wednesday, the 5th of July 1721 at Tyburn. Barbara was a rebellious young woman who wanted easy money and coining seemed to offer this. She was drawn to Tyburn tied to a hurdle (similar to a piece of wattle fencing) behind a horse, before being strangled at the stake prior to the fagots being lit.


Catherine Hayes was burned at Tyburn on Monday, the 9th of May 1726 for the Petty Treason murder of her husband. She had persuaded her two lovers to kill her husband with an axe, a crime for which the two men were sentenced to hang. She too was dragged on a hurdle to Tyburn and when she had finished praying, was fastened to the stake by an iron chain round her body.


 A rope halter was put round her neck (running through a hole in the stake) and the faggots (bundles of dry brushwood) piled round her. When Richard Arnet, the executioner, lit the fire he found the flames too fierce to allow him to pull the strangling rope so the poor women was burned alive - a horrible death that took a considerable time. Her execution is vividly described in the Newgate Calendar. She was reduced to ashes within an hour, so we are told.


Elizabeth Wright was burned for coining on the 19th of December 1733, although her 26 year old daughter and accomplice was reprieved.  Wednesday, the 2nd of October 1734 saw a triple burning, at Tyburn, of Mary Haycock, Elizabeth Tracey and Catherine Bougle for counterfeiting and possession of coining equipment.  This is London’s only recorded multiple burning in the 18th century.


Although burning was not a common punishment by this time, at least 33 women suffered this fate between 1735 and 1789.


Elizabeth Webber (or Webster) was probably burned at York in December 1739 for the murder of her husband but her execution cannot be confirmed.  Alice Davis was most probably burnt for coining on the 31st of March 1758.


At the September Sessions of the Old Bailey on the 8th of September 1773, Elizabeth Herring was indicted for “feloniously, traitorously, and of her malice aforethought, making an assault upon Robert Herring, her husband, and with a certain case knife giving him a mortal wound on the right side of the throat, of the length of one inch, and the depth of two inches, of which wound he instantly died, on August the 5th of that year.”


  She was convicted of Petty Treason (note the word “traitorously” in the indictment) and the Recorder passed the following sentence upon her, "you Elizabeth Herring are to be led from hence to the Gaol from whence you came; and on Monday next you are to be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution; where you are to be burnt with fire until you are dead."  The sentence was carried out at Tyburn in front of some 20,000 spectators on Monday, the 13th of September 1773.


The last woman to be burnt for petty treason, i.e. the murder of her husband in Britain, was Mary Bailey at Winchester, on Monday, the 8th of March 1784 thereafter hanging was substituted for this crime.  Her co-accused, John Quinn, was hanged first. 


The last three women to be burnt for coining offences were executed outside London’s Newgate prison, these being Phoebe Harris on Wednesday, the 21st of June 1786, Margaret Sullivan on Wednesday, the 25th of June 1788 and Catherine Murphy (also known as Christian Bowman), who was put to death on Wednesday, the 18th of March 1789. 


Margaret Sullivan and her co-accused, Jeremiah Grace, came to trial at the 7th of May Sessions of the Old Bailey in 1788.  They were indicted as follows, “for that they, on the 29th of April, a piece of base coin resembling the current silver coin of this kingdom, called a shilling, falsely and deceitfully, feloniously and traitorously did colour with materials, producing the colour of silver.”  For this crime of High Treason, Jeremiah was sentenced to be hanged and Margaret to be burnt. 


Catherine Murphy’s execution was to be the last burning of a woman in England and was really was only a modified form of hanging, followed by burning. She was led from the Debtor's Door of Newgate past the nearby gallows from which four men, including her husband, were already hanging, to the stake.


 Here she mounted a small platform in front of it and an iron band was put round her body. The noose, dangling from an iron bracket projecting from the top of the stake, was tightened around her neck. When the preparations were complete, William Brunskill, the hangman, removed the platform leaving her suspended and only after 30 minutes were the faggots placed around her and lit. 


On the 10th of May 1790, Sir Benjamin Hammett raised the issue of burning women in the House of Commons. He told fellow MP’s that it had been his painful office and duty in the previous year to attend the burning of a female (Catherine Murphy), in the office of Sheriff of London at the time, and he therefore moved to bring in a Bill to alter the law. 


He pointed out that the sheriff who refused to execute a sentence of burning alive was liable to prosecution, but thanked Heaven that there was not a man in England who would carry such a sentence literally into execution. 


 (see earlier reference to strangling prior to burning) The Treason Act of 1790 was passed (30 George III. C. 48) and Parliament substituted ordinary hanging for coining offences on the 5th of June 1790.  25 year old Sophia Girton who had been convicted of coining at the Old Bailey on the 24th of April 1790 was thus saved from the fire and was in fact pardoned on condition of transportation for life to New South Wales on the 12th of June 1790. Her co-defendant, Thomas Parker, was hanged on the 19th of May 1790.


Executions by burning at Newgate were distinctly unpopular with the local residents of what was a respectable business area of the City.  They had sent a petition to the Lord Mayor requesting that Phoebe Harris’ execution be carried out elsewhere.  There was an early version of “not in my back yard” rather than a protest against the severity of her punishment.  It was later reported that some locals became ill from the smoke from her body. 


 There were similar protests over the Sullivan and Murphy executions and a great feeling of relief when Sophia Girton was reprieved, and the whole ghastly business passed into history under the provisions of the Treason Act of 1790.  The Sheriffs were also becoming increasingly unhappy about attending burnings, and it was they who brought forward the Bill to end this practice.  Even though by this time the condemned woman was dead before the faggots were lit, it must have still been a gruesome and revolting spectacle and one which conveyed a feeling of injustice.  Men convicted of coining offences were hanged in the same way as other condemned males. 


 The Times newspaper took up this theme after Phoebe’s burning and printed the following article: “The execution of a woman for coining on Wednesday morning, reflects a scandal upon the law and was not only inhuman, but shamefully indelicate and shocking. Why should the law in this species of offence inflict a severer punishment upon a woman, than a man. It is not an offence which she can perpetrate alone - in every such case the insistence of a man has been found the operating motive upon the woman; yet the man is but hanged, and the woman burned.”  Other London newspapers carried similar articles. 


 Similar outrage was expressed two years later at the burning of Margaret Sullivan, although strangely there was little media interest at the burning of Christian Murphy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs North Korea, Jan 03:  Unlike previous executions of political prisoners, the execution of Jang Song Thaek on December 12 was reportedly one of the most brutal ones ever conducted by the North Korean regime. According to a detailed account published in Wen Wei Po, a Hong Kong based Chinese newspaper, Jang Song Thaek, Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-Un’s uncle and the second most powerful man in North Korea, was stripped naked and thrown into a cage of 120 hounds who had been starved for three days. During the brutal execution, which was reportedly personally overseen by Kim Jong Un, the hounds were allowed to prey on Jang Song Thaek and five of his closest aides who also had been stripped and thrown into the cage. According to the report, the entire process lasted for about an hour by the end of which they were completely eaten up. This is called "quan je" or "execution by dogs". Political ...

WOMAN FORCED TO RUN N@KED THROUGH THE STREETS AFTER BEING CAUGHT HAVING S3X BY HER LOVER’S WIFE

WOMAN FORCED TO RUN N@KED THROUGH THE STREETS AFTER BEING CAUGHT HAVING S3X BY HER LOVER’S WIFE The Sun reported that passers-by took pictures of a woman as she desperately tried to cover her modesty. A WOMAN was forced to flee naked from her married lover’s bed after allegedly being busted naked by his WIFE. The extreme walk of shame was fully captured on camera by shocked passers-by in a packed city centre. According to a clip seen online, the redhead desperately tries to cover her modesty as she walks the streets stark naked and struggling to cover up as she walks alongside fully clothed pedestrians and crosses the road in front of a tram. Pictires have since gone viral. One eye-witness said he believed that the woman’s walk of shame was a forfeit for losing a horny bet which was ready after along dry spell. And netizen ‘Kkt’ said: “Maybe she just really wanted to have sex and simply went out on the hunt like that being completely desperate. If she was running away from her lo...

I WEPT AFTER READING THIS JUDGE'S SENTENCE ON A 15 YEAR OLD BOY...

I WEPT AFTER READING THIS JUDGE'S SENTENCE ON A 15 YEAR OLD BOY... This was a fifteen year old boy.... He was caught stealing bread from a store. On trying to escape from the hold of the guard, a shelf of the store was also broken. The judge heard the crime and asked the boy, “Did you really steal something, a loaf of bread and cheese?” The boy responded by looking down.;- “Yes.” Judge: - “Why?” Boy: - “I needed it.” Judge: - “Couldn't you have bought?” Boy: - “There was no money.” Judge: - “Take it from the family.” Boy: - “There is only a mother in the house. Sick and unemployed. Judge: - “You don't do anything?” Boy: - “Used to wash a car. When I took a day off to take care of my mother, I was fired.” Judge: - “Don’t you ask someone for help?” Boy: - “Had left the house since morning, went to about fifty (50) people, but no help; so, I decided to take this step at the very end.” When the arguments ended, the judge began to pronounce the verdict; “The theft and especially...

After Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Tragedy and Humiliation.

After Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Tragedy and Humiliation.  U.S. and Australian brutalisation of women on the Japanese mainland.   (Excerpt From Pages 66-69) All references are provided in the book itself.  “There was a far darker side to the U.S. and allied occupation of Japan, one which is little mentioned in the vast majority of histories – American or otherwise. When Japan surrendered in August 1945, mass rapes by occupying forces were expected… [despite setting up of a comfort women which recruited or otherwise trafficked desperate women to brothels] such crimes were still common and several of them were extremely brutal and resulted in the deaths of the victims. Political science professor Eiji Takemae wrote regard- ing the conduct of American soldiers occupying Japan: ‘U.S. troops comported themselves like conquerors, especially in the early weeks and months of occupation. Misbehavior ranged from black-marketeering, petty theft, reckless driving and disorderly con...

King Edward VII Love Chair

  King Edward VII (nicknamed Bertie), had a custom made ‘siege d’amour’ (or love chair), kept at the famous Le Chabanais brothel in Paris. It was built to allow him to have sex with two or more people all at the same time.  The chair was the ultimate symbol of Bertie’s voracious sexual appetite, which became a constant headache for the royal family, especially his mother, who believed him utterly untrustworthy and severely limited his Royal responsibilities as a result.  However, the more Queen Victoria disapproved, the more extravagant Bertie became in his pursuits of pleasure, the chair being the ultimate testament to his rebellious and irresponsible behaviour. The press gave him the name ‘Dirty Bertie’. It was said that his father had a word with him about his dalliances and then died shortly after their chat. Queen Victoria blamed his death on the stress brought about by “that dreadful business”, or at least a big contributing factor of it. She then arranged his marri...

True Story Of Josephine Myrtle Corbin, The Lady Born With Four Legs & Two Private Parts

True Story Of Josephine Myrtle Corbin, The Lady Born With Four Legs & Two Private Parts  Residents were curious of Josephine's rare look, so the father decided to make money from it by charging them a token to look at his four-legged daughter. When she was thirteen, Josephine travelled to different towns in the company of his father for sideshow performance which earned them a lot of money. While at a glance one could see four legs dangling beyond the hem of her dress only one pair actually belonged to her. The other set belonged to her DIPYGUS twin sister. Born in Lincoln County, TN in 1868 and spending most of her childhood in Blount Council, AL - where she can be found in the 1880 census, her condition was incredibly rare. The tiny body of her twin was only fully developed from the waist down and even then it was malformed - tiny and possessing only three toes but she was able to control the limbs of her sister but was unable to use them to for walking and she herself had di...

ON THIS DAY, AUGUST 31, 2016, A SUGGESTIVE PICTURE OF A BRIDE HAVING A LAST S*XUAL

ON THIS DAY, AUGUST 31, 2016, A SUGGESTIVE PICTURE OF A BRIDE HAVING A LAST S*XUAL On this day, August 31, 2016, a suggestive picture of a bride having a last s*xual encounter with her ex-boyfriend a short distance away from her wedding venue was emerged. A Facebook user, Bukola Atupa Ajeigbe shared an odd photo of an unnamed bride preparing to be bonked from behind in doggy fashion by an ex boyfriend shockingly on the day of her wedding with her full outfit on. After-thoughts also have it that the picture could have been taken from a movie scene although the faces of the characters or persons are not known on the television screens...

The Battle and Ra.pe of Manila

The Battle and Ra.pe of Manila  While the Rape of Nanking in China is slowly making its way into mainstream media and educational systems, the Manila massacre is still struggling to get recognition regardless of the inexplicable inhumanity involved, matching even that of Nanking.  An American soldier in Manila rescuing a wounded Filipino girl Time: February 1945 Sources: MacArthur Archives The Japanese occupation of the Philippines' capital started after five months of fierce fighting against US forces during the early days of the Pacific War. Manila was declared an "open city" (undefended and exempt from enemy aggression) on December 26, 1941, by American General Douglas MacArthur, who vowed to return one day. His chance finally came on January 9, 1945, when MacArthur's 6th Army came ashore upon the beaches of Lingayen Bay to liberate the Philippines. General Douglas MacArthur coming ashore from an LCVP on Lingayen Gulf Blue 1 landing beach, Luzon, Philippines, 9 Jan...

WARNING! Graphic Content Below Are Frank Discussion Of Rape, Execution. Not Meant For The Weak.

WARNING! Graphic Content Below Are Frank Discussion Of Rape, Execution. Not Meant For The Weak. 'Blood oozed through the soil at grave sites. You could see the pits move, some of them were still alive': The secrets of Ukraine's shameful 'Holocaust of Bullets' killing centre where 1.6million Jews were executed . Seventy years on from the end of the Second World War the full, shocking scale of the Nazi-inspired Holocaust in Ukraine is finally being revealed - thanks to pioneering work by a French Catholic priest to research the truth of the industrial-scale killing. Around 2,000 mass graves of Jewish victims have been located where men, women and children were shot and buried by the Germans and their collaborators. But there maybe up to 6,000 more sites to uncover, with victims of this 'Holocaust of bullets' - so called because unlike in Poland and Germany where gas chambers were used as the means of slaughter - here most were summarily shot and buried nearby....

The Nanking Massacre is a devastating example of the suffering that can be inflicted on a defeated or weak country during times of war.

The Nanking Massacre is a devastating example of the suffering that can be inflicted on a defeated or weak country during times of war. It serves as a reminder of the importance of working to prevent conflicts and protect civilians in times of conflict. It is also a testament to the resilience and strength of the human spirit, as many survivors of the massacre were able to rebuild their lives and move forward despite the unimaginable horrors they had experienced. The Nanking Massacre, also known as the Nanjing Massacre, was a horrific event that took place in the Chinese city of Nanjing in December 1937, during the Second Sino-Japanese War. After the Japanese Imperial Army invaded and captured the city, they carried out a campaign of mass murder, rape, and destruction that lasted for several weeks. It is estimated that as many as 300,000 Chinese civilians and prisoners of war were killed during this time. The Nanking Massacre is a tragic example of the suffering that can be inflicted o...