Skip to main content

Execution of Perkin Warbeck: Pretender or one of the Princes in the Tower?



 Execution of Perkin Warbeck: Pretender or one of the Princes in the Tower?


On 23rd November 1499 Perkin Warbeck was hanged at Tyburn. Perkin Warbeck had claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury, Duke of York. Richard was one of the two Princes in the Tower, placed there in the summer of 1483 together with his older brother Edward. The princes were sons of Edward IV and Queen Elizabeth Woodville. As is very well known their uncle, Richard of Gloucester, succeeded in having himself declared king and the two princes, then aged twelve and nine respectively, disappeared.


Rumours concerning the fate of the princes started quite soon after their disappearance with many believing that they had been murdered. Their uncle, Richard III, was defeated at the Battle of Bosworth in August 1485, after which Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond, took the throne as Henry VII. He married the princes elder sister, Elizabeth of York then aged almost twenty, in January 1486.


Henry VII faced various challenges and rebellions in the early years of his reign, as he struggled to establish himself as king; the claims of Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck to be Yorkist heirs were among the most important as had they been successful that could have had serious implications for the new Tudor dynasty. Lambert claimed to be Edward, Earl of Warwick, son of George, Duke of Clarence and a nephew of both Edward IV and Richard III. The Lambert Simnel rebellion failed in 1487, Lambert himself was pardoned by Henry VII who presumably thought that the ten-year-old boy was a pawn, and he was subsequently given a job in the royal kitchens and lived until approximately 1525.


When a young man arrived in Cork, Ireland, in December 1491, he was initially thought to be Edward, Earl of Warwick but soon the claim was being made that he was actually Richard, Duke of York, one of the two princes in the Tower. Had Richard been still alive he would have been eighteen years old at that time. Cork, like much of Ireland, still remained loyal or at least sympathetic to the Yorkist cause and the Pretender received support there. The following year, 1492, he arrived in Burgundy where Margaret, the dowager Duchess accepted him as her nephew. Margaret was a sister of both Edward IV and Richard III and therefore would have been the aunt of Richard of Shrewsbury. Whether Margaret really believed that he was Richard of York or persuaded herself that he was cannot be known at this stage.


The supposed Richard received a great deal of support, at least initially, not only from Margaret of Burgundy but from Charles VIII of France and James IV of Scotland, who even arranged a marriage between the pretender and Lady Katherine Gordon, daughter the 2nd Earl of Huntly; another supporter, for a time anyway, was Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor. How much any of those people actually believed that this was indeed Richard of Shrewsbury is debatable as all had their own reasons for their support. In England residual support for the Yorkist cause still lingered but the continuing uncertainty over the fate of Edward IV’s sons may have been another factor.


In September 1497 the Pretender landed in Cornwall and though he was at first enthusiastically received this soon fizzled out; by October he had been brought before Henry. He confessed to being an imposter, named Pierrechon de Werbecque, born around 1474, son of Jehan de Werbecque a merchant from Tournai (modern Belgium) and Katherine de Faro. By June 1498, he was imprisoned in the Tower of London. The following year he became implicated in a plot involving Edward, Earl of Warwick (who was lodged close to him in the Tower) and others to escape with the hope of overthrowing Henry VII. 


Perkin Warbeck's trial took place on 16th November 1499 in the Palace of Westminster and he was condemned to death. On 23rd November 1499, after one final confession that he was not Richard of Shrewsbury, Perkin Warbeck was hanged at Tyburn and was buried in the Church of Austin Friars in the City of London*. 


Others involved in the plot were also executed, the most high profile being Edward, Earl of Warwick, on 28th November.


Perkin’s wife, Lady Katherine Gordon, survived him and became a lady-in-waiting to Elizabeth of York, she had a further three marriages, though all after the death of Henry VII, and died in 1537.


Aside from showing that the Tudor dynasty was somewhat shaky, at least in its early years, the most interesting aspect of this case to me is the question whether the Pretender was or was not the real Richard of Shrewsbury. The fact that so many people, including important European rulers, were prepared to apparently accept that he was Richard does not really prove anything as they all had their own particular reasons not to support Henry VII, or at least a desire to embarrass the English king. Even the fact that the Pretender admitted to being an imposter when questioned does not prove a great deal either as he may have been questioned under duress. There is also the further difficulty that people who take on other identities, especially from a young age, can become confused about who they really are, but that is the sort of issue that interests modern psychologists and would not have been understood or sympathised with in the late 15th century.


A further question concerns the attitude of Elizabeth of York. By 1491 when Perkin had landed in Cork and the first claims that he was the real Richard of Shrewsbury had been made, Elizabeth had been married to Henry VII for five years, was Queen of England and had three children of her own, Arthur, Prince of Wales, born in 1486, Margaret in 1489 and Henry (the future Henry VIII) in June 1491. What would she feel about the sudden appearance of a brother, whom she had not seen since 1483, and whom she may have known only slightly? If the Pretender really had been her brother, then he would have threatened not only her husband’s throne and her own position as Queen but also the future of her children. Would she really have been prepared to offer support to Perkin, even if he were her brother, and risk putting so much in jeopardy? It seems likely that just as Margaret of Burgundy may have persuaded herself that Perkin was her nephew so Elizabeth would have the opposite motivation; even if she had a tiny suspicion that he could have been her brother, she may have been able to persuade herself that he was not.


The truth of Perkin Warbeck will probably never be known with one hundred percent certainty; one way would be if a body were found that could be identified as his with DNA results proving he was a genetic Plantagenet. But as Perkin's body appears to be lost the possibility of carrying out DNA tests is not an option. However, even if that were to be the case a great many people are likely to have had Plantagenet blood and it would not prove that such a body was Richard. In fact, it has been suggested that Perkin might have been an illegitimate son of Edward IV or even of one of his brothers (George, Duke of Clarence & Richard III). Another way would be if the bones that were found in the Tower of London in 1674 were finally definitively identified. It has been rumoured, though not confirmed, that King Charles may be prepared to allow DNA testing on the bones. If they are indeed those of Edward V and Richard, then that would solve the mystery of Perkin Warbeck. It would finally prove that Perkin Warbeck was Perkin Warbeck and not Richard of Shrewsbury. 


* This church, orignally built in the 13th-century now known as the Dutch Church, given to Protestant refugees in 1550. It was destroyed in an air raid in 1940 and was rebuilt in 1950-56. What became of Perkin Warbeck's burial site it not known and it is presumed lost. 


Background:

History of the life and reign of Richard the Third, to which is added the story of Perkin Warbeck : from original documents by James Gairdner, Cambridge University Press, 1898.

Ian Arthurson: The Perkin Warbeck Conspiracy 1491-1499. The History Press, Stroud, 2009.

Ann Wroe: Perkin, A Story of Deception. Vintage, London, 2004.

Robert Shepherd : Westminster, A Biography: . Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2012.

E.F. Jacobs: The Oxford History of Fifteenth Century England. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985.

Gunn, S. J. "Warbeck, Perkin [Pierrechon de Werbecque; alias Richard Plantagenet, duke of York] (c. 1474–1499), impostor and claimant to the English throne." Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 23 Sep. 2004; Accessed 20 Nov. 2023. https://www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-28669.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

During World War II, millions of people were sent to concentration camps, including women.

During World War II, millions of people were sent to concentration camps, including women. Women in concentration camps were subjected to brutal treatment and often faced more severe conditions than their male counterparts. The conditions in the camps were inhumane, and women were often subjected to forced labor, starvation, and medical experiments. Women were treated differently in concentration camps than men. They were often separated from their families, forced to perform hard labor, and subjected to sexual abuse. Women who were pregnant were also subjected to harsh conditions and medical experimentation. Many women were killed, either as part of the genocide or because they were deemed too weak to continue working. One of the most notorious concentration camps where women were held was Auschwitz-Birkenau. There, women were subjected to forced labor, starvation, and medical experimentation. Many were killed in gas chambers or through other forms of execution. The camp was designe

The capture of brave Russian officer Rosinski

The capture of brave Russian officer Rosinski This is a shocking image and I apologize in advance for sharing it, but here’s one that truly got to me… in Belarus, 1918, after WWI had already ended, the brave Russian officer Rosinski was captured by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks tortured the captain, likely to get information out of the man, which he bravely refused to give. After that, they simply continued with the torture out of some sick sense of innate cruelty. He was ‘the enemy’ and he was at their mercy, so they brutally murdered their captive. The brave captain was emasculated. And anally impaled on a tree branch. All this while still alive. Alfred Savoir, the man who published the picture and was an eye witness to the death of the brave military officer, described "M. B.", who ordered this atrocity, thus: I knew him not long ago; he was a charming teenager with an ironic wit and joker. He was rubbed with French culture, he admired the novels of Barres and he quoted w

Frank Discussion Of Rape And Other Atrocities Committed During War.

WARNING! PHOTO BELOW ARE NOT MET FOR THE WEAK HEART. Please note: The following subject matter is of immense importance, but could be difficult to read. There is a Frank Discussion Of Rape And Other Atrocities Committed During War. After entering a large museum in one of the world’s most ancient cities and the former capital of the Chinese empire, Nanking—or Nanjing as it’s known today—my 18-year-old daughter Sophia and I walked over a glass walkway that allowed us to look down 10 feet of earth and observe an ancient footpath. Lights highlighted the ground under the glass while the room we were in was dark.  To our right hung numerous photographs on a black wall showing Japanese soldiers slaughtering Chinese citizens in December 1937 revealed by individual lights, the types one sees on art museum paintings. Dead babies, severed heads, piles of bodies on Yangtze River banks, and helpless prisoners of war were all documented there by photographs taken by the perpetrators themselves, I

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs North Korea, Jan 03:  Unlike previous executions of political prisoners, the execution of Jang Song Thaek on December 12 was reportedly one of the most brutal ones ever conducted by the North Korean regime. According to a detailed account published in Wen Wei Po, a Hong Kong based Chinese newspaper, Jang Song Thaek, Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-Un’s uncle and the second most powerful man in North Korea, was stripped naked and thrown into a cage of 120 hounds who had been starved for three days. During the brutal execution, which was reportedly personally overseen by Kim Jong Un, the hounds were allowed to prey on Jang Song Thaek and five of his closest aides who also had been stripped and thrown into the cage. According to the report, the entire process lasted for about an hour by the end of which they were completely eaten up. This is called "quan je" or "execution by dogs". Political

15 Most Brutal Rape Punishments Around The World.

15 Most Brutal Rape Punishments Around The World. Rape is considered the most offensive crime in every society. Rape victims are often looked down in the society and had to suffer mental torture without any fault of her/him. This horrific impact of physical and mental assault often ruin the life of a victim. Different governments across the globe came up with strong laws against sexual assault to make their country a safer place for their citizen and to make sure no one who indulged in this heinous crime could roam free. Here are the most brutal rape punishments of different countries around the world. In China, The meritocratic leadership punishes the rapist straight away with a death sentence and in some scenarios rapist are also punished by the mutilation of their genitals. 2. Iran In Iran, the rapist is either hanged or shot to death in public. Sometimes the guilty escapes the death penalty by the premission from the victim but is still liable for 100 lashes or life imprisonm

Agabbadòra Hammer

Agabbadòra Hammer “In Sardinia, the use of the "femina agabbadòra hammer" was a women's practice. Whenever an elderly man or woman of a given family was dying and in great pain, the family would call for the Accabadòra or Lady of the Good Death. She would usually be a widow dressed entirely in black, who likely inherited her role from her own mother or grandmother. The title Accabadora means "She is the One Who Ends." She arrives with a large hammer of carved olive wood wrapped in heavy wool, and is left alone with the individual who may yet be screaming in agony and terror. A witness testimonial of the practice translates: "It was dark. The room was illuminated by a single wick in mastic oil. The Accabadòra entered the house -- the door had been left open for her. She passed no one as she enters her patient's room at at the bedside.  "She caressed the face of the dying person, chanted the rosary, sang one of the many lullabies usually sung to chil

True Story Of Josephine Myrtle Corbin, The Lady Born With Four Legs & Two Private Parts

True Story Of Josephine Myrtle Corbin, The Lady Born With Four Legs & Two Private Parts  Residents were curious of Josephine's rare look, so the father decided to make money from it by charging them a token to look at his four-legged daughter. When she was thirteen, Josephine travelled to different towns in the company of his father for sideshow performance which earned them a lot of money. While at a glance one could see four legs dangling beyond the hem of her dress only one pair actually belonged to her. The other set belonged to her DIPYGUS twin sister. Born in Lincoln County, TN in 1868 and spending most of her childhood in Blount Council, AL - where she can be found in the 1880 census, her condition was incredibly rare. The tiny body of her twin was only fully developed from the waist down and even then it was malformed - tiny and possessing only three toes but she was able to control the limbs of her sister but was unable to use them to for walking and she herself had di

King Edward VII Love Chair

  King Edward VII (nicknamed Bertie), had a custom made ‘siege d’amour’ (or love chair), kept at the famous Le Chabanais brothel in Paris. It was built to allow him to have sex with two or more people all at the same time.  The chair was the ultimate symbol of Bertie’s voracious sexual appetite, which became a constant headache for the royal family, especially his mother, who believed him utterly untrustworthy and severely limited his Royal responsibilities as a result.  However, the more Queen Victoria disapproved, the more extravagant Bertie became in his pursuits of pleasure, the chair being the ultimate testament to his rebellious and irresponsible behaviour. The press gave him the name ‘Dirty Bertie’. It was said that his father had a word with him about his dalliances and then died shortly after their chat. Queen Victoria blamed his death on the stress brought about by “that dreadful business”, or at least a big contributing factor of it. She then arranged his marriage to Princes

I WEPT AFTER READING THIS JUDGE'S SENTENCE ON A 15 YEAR OLD BOY...

I WEPT AFTER READING THIS JUDGE'S SENTENCE ON A 15 YEAR OLD BOY... This was a fifteen year old boy.... He was caught stealing bread from a store. On trying to escape from the hold of the guard, a shelf of the store was also broken. The judge heard the crime and asked the boy, “Did you really steal something, a loaf of bread and cheese?” The boy responded by looking down.;- “Yes.” Judge: - “Why?” Boy: - “I needed it.” Judge: - “Couldn't you have bought?” Boy: - “There was no money.” Judge: - “Take it from the family.” Boy: - “There is only a mother in the house. Sick and unemployed. Judge: - “You don't do anything?” Boy: - “Used to wash a car. When I took a day off to take care of my mother, I was fired.” Judge: - “Don’t you ask someone for help?” Boy: - “Had left the house since morning, went to about fifty (50) people, but no help; so, I decided to take this step at the very end.” When the arguments ended, the judge began to pronounce the verdict; “The theft and especially

"Wooden Horse or Spanish Donkey"

"Wooden Horse or Spanish Donkey"  The wooden horse, or Spanish donkey, was an extremely painful and gruesome medieval torture device.  It was first used by the Holy Inquisition in France and then in Spain and Germany, and then migrated to the Americas, gaining prominence during the colonial period.  The main design was the same wherever it was used.  It was a triangular wooden box with a very sharp top end (ie where the horse's spine would be).  The apparatus was constructed of wood, with planks nailed together to form a long, tapered ridge, which would serve as the horse's back.  These were supported by four legs attached to a bracket, about 6 or 7 feet (1.8 to 2.1 metres) high, with wheels fitted to the bottom of the legs so that the entire device could roll across the ground.  A head and tail would be attached to make the torture device look like an almost “fun” huge wooden horse.  The defendant would be mounted on the horse, with ankle weights and hands tied behin