Skip to main content

Hereford prison.

 



Hereford prison.


In the late 18th century many counties in England and Wales constructed new county gaols to replace their dilapidated and/or unsuitable ones.  Herefordshire was no exception and began planning a new county gaol and house of correction in 1790.


The new County Gaol was designed on a cruciform plan by architect John Nash and his design approved in July 1792.  The prison was constructed between 1794 and 1796 on Bye Street Without (now Commercial Road) on land known as “The Priory”.  It was reported to have cost £18,646 16s 3 1/2d.  The stone building initially had four two story wings radiating out from the octagonal Great Hall, providing good visibility of the four wings and the prison’s yards.  The prison chapel was above the Great Hall.  The new gaol was surrounded by a high brick wall and opened for prisoners in the Summer of 1796.

The gatehouse was a single story building with a flat roof upon which the “New Drop” gallows was erected for public hangings up to 1864.  After this the mill room was used to house the gallows, constructed over a brick lined pit.


In 1877 the City and County Gaols were amalgamated into the County Gaol by the Prisons Act, giving a capacity of 132 separate cells, which was considered sufficient to house all the prisoners in Herefordshire.  The City Gaol was then closed.  On the 1st of April 1878 control of the prison was transferred to the Prison Commission of the Home Office.


There was a separate detached house for the keeper as the governor was called then.  The prison was expanded and improved through the 19th century and had facilities to house male and female felons up to 1905 and initially debtors, until the passing of the Debtors Act of 1869.  The prison closed to ordinary criminals in March 1915 and the inmates were transferred to Gloucester prison.  The building was used as a detention centre for World War I military deserters. The prison finally closed completely in 1929 and was demolished by Eli Pearson contractors in 1930.  The governor’s house was converted into offices and toilets for the new bus station.

Executions at Hereford.

Gallows Tumps was the earliest known place of execution at Hereford and was located south of the town near Belmont Road (A465). (A Tump is a hillock or mound.)

Between the 12th of March 1737 and the 21st of August 1789, there were 334 death sentences passed at the Hereford Assizes resulting in 54 confirmed executions, plus 7 probable/possible ones where no reprieve has been found, at this location.

St. Owen's Street, Hereford.

On Monday the 2nd of August 1790, 27 year old William Jones and his 18 year old girlfriend, Susannah Rugg, were hanged on a gallows set up in St. Owen's Street, opposite the old County Gaol.  Jones was convicted of the murder by arsenic poisoning of his wife, Ann, in the parish of Clodock on the 26th of March 1790.  Ann died the following day, the 27th of March. Susannah Rugg was executed for aiding and abetting him.  These were the only executions at this location.  Jones was afterwards hanged in chains (gibbeted) on Longtown Green and Susannah’s body was dissected, both in accordance with the Murder Act of 1751.  This was a classic love triangle case where Ann was an impediment to their relationship.

Hereford new County Gaol, in public.

There were 13 hangings here from 6th of August 1792 to the 5th of April 1864.  All these took place on the New Drop gallows erected on the gatehouse roof.  Samuel Burrows officiated at the four executions in 1830 and 1832, prior to that the name(s) of the hangman is unknown.  George Smith of Dudley carried out the last two public hangings here.  The bodies of inmates convicted of murder were buried within the “precincts of the prison” after 1832, as required by their sentence.  Bodies of non-murderers could be claimed by their family and friends.

William (alias John) Phillips, convicted of sheep stealing, was the first to be hanged at the Gaol on the 6th of August 1796.  He had been convicted of stealing 21 wethers, valued at £12, the property of John Williams, in the parish of Garway on the 10th of May 1796.

There were 12 hangings between 1801 and 1837. 

The first in the 19th century was that of Thomas Jones who was hanged on the 15th of August 1801 for burglary at the home of Edmund Stallard at Clifford.

Stephen Price was hanged on the 31st of March 1804 for sheep stealing from F. Harris Esq. The Moor, Lyonshall.

Only one woman, Susannah Pugh, would be hanged here in the 19th century.  She was executed on the 28th of March 1808 for the murder of her 12 year old daughter, Sarah, whose throat she had slashed at their home, a rented room in Gaol Lane in Hereford.  The murder occurred around 5 a.m. on the 19th of August 1807, while little Sarah was sleeping. Two other women sharing the room managed to wrestle the razor away from the mother, preventing her from cutting her own throat.  Sarah could no longer afford to rent this room and she and her daughter would have been forced to part, hence why she decided to kill her and take her own life.  A very sad case that underlines the poverty of the time.

Thomas Watkins was hanged on the 23rd of March 1811 for the murder of a Joan Gwillim at Longtown.  His mother, Mary, was also convicted of the murder, but Watkins insisted that he alone committed it and she was respited for three weeks and later reprieved.

On the 24th of August 1811 John Rudd was to die for forgery of Ludlow Bank notes.

The following year William Hylett (alias Eyelett) was hanged on the 11th of April 1812 for stealing two horses at Raglan.

28 year old William Cadwallader from Leominster was executed on the 1st of April 1816, for the murder of his wife of seven years.  He also confessed to the murder of his daughter, who had been found dead in her bed after his “savage treatment of her”.  It seems that Cadwallader wanted rid of his wife so that he could marry his girlfriend.  His grandfather had also been hanged for the murder of his wife with a similar motive.

Richard Underwood was hanged on the 31st of March 1817 for the murder of Mr. William Harris, the proprietor of the New Inn in Ledbury.  Underwood was an ostler at the inn and had killed Mr. Harris with an axe so that he could rob him of his watch and money.

12 days later on the 12th of April 1817, there was a double hanging, Thomas Langslow for “cutting and maiming” (stabbing) John Green at Kington and John Hardy for horse theft and burglary during which he stole £200 worth of silver plate from the home of John Holford at Kilgwin House in Carmathanshire.  

 

On the 11th of April 1818, 16 year old John Burlow was hanged for arson at his employer, Mr. Thomas Gibb’s farm at Munsley.  The fire claimed the lives of seven horses and destroyed the stables and a hay store.

On the 22nd of August 1818 James Webb was executed for stealing nine sheep at Acton Beauchamp, the property of Mr. Elcocks at Colwell.

Five men were hanged here between 1828 and 1832.

19 year old James Williams was executed for highway robbery at Tupsley on the 17th of April 1830.  The victim was Francis Wellington, an old soldier who was walking home to Lugwardine and was robbed of his pension money, just £5.

On the 26th of March 1832, Joseph Pugh, John Matthews and William Williams (brother of James Williams above) were to die for the murder of Walter Carwardine in the brothel run by Pugh in Quaker’s Lane, Hereford.  It would appear that the motive was robbery.  Carwardine’s body had been thrown into the River Wye and lay undiscovered in the water for three weeks.

James Gammon was executed on the 25th of August 1832 for the rape of Charlotte Powell, aged 7, at Whitchurch.  It should be noted that after 1837 only murder and attempted murder (up to 1861) were capital crimes.

There were no further executions at Hereford until the 15th of April 1863 when 30 year old William Hope was hanged for the rape and murder of 16 year old Mary Corbett, at Ullingswick.  Hope confessed to the crime.  The execution reportedly drew a large crowd.

At 8.00 a.m. on Tuesday the 5th of April 1864, Thomas Watkins became the last to die in public, for the murder of his wife, Mary Ann, on the 18th of January that year, in a field at Hennor near Leominster. He was tried at the Hereford Lent Assizes before Mr. Baron Piggot on Wednesday the 30th of March.  He had initially pleaded guilty but then withdrew this and stood trial.  The night before his hanging Watkins made a confession and the motive was reported to be to prevent his wife telling the parish authorities of his whereabouts as he was a deserter from the Marines.  Only a small number of people witnessed this hanging as it was a very wet morning.  George Smith from Dudley carried out both of these hangings.

Hereford County Gaol, in private.

Five executions took place from the 24th of November 1885 to the 15th of December 1903.

John Hill and John Williams.

34 year old John Hill, alias 'Sailor Jack', and 36 year old John Williams, aka “Irish Jack”, were convicted of the murder of 32 year old Ann Dickinson, also known as Ann Doherty, at Weobley on the 30th of September 1885. 

Ann and her friend, Mrs. Mary Ann Farrell had gone out for the evening to the Red Lion pub in Weobley, taking Mary’s baby with them.  Here they met and talked with Hill and Williams.  Shortly after the two men left the pub, Ann and Mrs. Farrell left to walk to Holme Farm where they were working as hop pickers.  Hill offered to see them home and he and the two women started to walk across the fields.  They came to a gate and Mrs. Farrell opened it and went through first.  She was assaulted by a man with a heavy stick and knocked unconscious.  When she came round she saw that the man was Williams, whom she knew and he was trying to take her baby.  She ran to the nearby cottage of a shepherd and he took her in and later escorted her to Holme Farm.  The next morning Ann’s body was found in a ditch by two men going to work. It was reported that “she had been subject to the grossest ill-treatment and that her features were almost unrecognisable”.  Whether “grossest ill-treatment” is a Victorian euphemism for rape is unclear.

Williams was arrested in Weobley.  When Hill was located his clothing had blood spatter on it, consistent with the beating that he had inflicted upon Ann.


Hill and Williams were tried at Gloucester before Mr. Justice Field on Thursday the 5th of November 1885.  It was admitted that the murder was committed with a knob kerry stick owned by Williams.  Both men were convicted on the doctrine of common purpose.


They were hanged on Tuesday the 24th of November 1885 by James Berry.  He gave both men a drop of eight feet and as usual, death was reported to have been instantaneous.


James Jones and Alfred Scandrett.

In the early hours of October the 19th, 1887, two 23 year old men broke into a home of 85 year old Phillip Ballard, at Tupsley in Hereford and beat him with an axe, ransacking the house and escaping with anything of value that they could find.  Mr. Ballard was found by his niece Miss Ada Ballard who also lived there and had been woken by the servants.  Despite the best efforts of the local doctor Mr. Ballard succumbed to his injuries four days later. 

Scandrett was later arrested in Birmingham and Jones in Hereford. They were tried at Hereford Assizes before the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Coleridge, on the 2nd of March 1888.  Both pleaded not guilty and both blamed the other for the murder.  Scandrett attempted to strangle Jones to death in the dock, apparently because he blamed Jones for his being caught.

In the condemned cell Scandrett confessed that he alone was responsible for the murder, but under the doctrine of common purpose, Jones who admitted to being present but doing nothing to prevent the attack, was equally guilty.

They were hanged by James Berry on the 20th of March 1888.  Reporters were still allowed to witness executions at this time and full details were printed.  Jones weighed 140 lbs and Scandrett, 142 lbs.  Berry gave them both a drop of 6 feet.  Both were reported to be calm and resigned to their fate.  Within a minute of arrival on the gallows, under which a pit had been dug, Berry operated the lever.  Scandrett died without a struggle, while Jones’ body reportedly “quivered” on the rope for nearly a minute.  The rope used for Alfred Scandrett had previously been used for the hanging of Elizabeth Berry and is pictured at the Science Museum, together with a newspaper drawing of him.  At this time newspapers could print drawings but not photographs and commissioned artists to attend trials to draw the defendant.


Charles Saunders.

On Wednesday the 23rd of December 1891, 31 year old Charles Saunders was hanged for the murder of two year old Walter Frederick Steers at Little Hereford, near Leominster in May 1891. Walter had last been seen alive at Ludlow Fair in the Spring of 1891.

Saunders, whose occupation was given as a blacksmith and his girlfriend used poor little Walter to help them beg for money.  Reportedly Saunders regularly physically abused Walter and one night when he would not stop crying, Saunders picked him by the legs and dashed his head against the floor.


Saunders was tried at Hereford on Friday the 4th of December 1891.  The main witness for the prosecution was his girlfriend, Elizabeth Caldwell. The couple had, it seemed “borrowed” the little boy from a couple who lived in London.  They had found a deserted cottage to live in and it was here that the murder took place.  The exact date could not be determined because the body was not discovered for some 16 weeks.  It had been hidden under a pile of straw.


The execution was carried out by James Billington, working without an assistant and was scheduled for 8.00 a.m.  However Billington was late arriving as there had been thick fog hampering his journey from Durham where he had executed John Johnson the previous day.  He did not reach the prison until after 9 a.m.  The execution was therefore delayed until 10.00 a.m.  Saunders was given a drop of eight feet and death was reported to be instantaneous by the solitary reporter permitted to be present. It was recorded that after the trapdoor fell the body swung from side to side and the arms seemed to twitch for several seconds.


William Haywood - Hereford’s last hanging.

61 year old William Haywood was hanged on Tuesday the 15th of December 1903 for the murder of his wife, Jane.  Haywood worked at Pokehouse Wood quarry at Lucton near Leominster in Herefordshire and had been married to Jane for a long time.


On Saturday the 11th of July 1903 Haywood called at the Mortimer’s Cross Inn where he drank a pint of beer and bought another plus some whiskey before going to the quarry.


At 8 a.m. Jane took his breakfast to the quarry.  Around 1 p.m. Haywood returned to the Mortimer’s Cross Inn where he had another pint and told someone that he had thrown a stone at Jane which had hit her in the head and she was bleeding.  He went on “if she is dead when I get back, I will bury her in the brook.”


At 8.45 p.m. William was walking towards the Inn, pushing a wheelbarrow containing Jane’s body.  The police were sent for and Haywood told them that his wife had met with an accident.  A search of the quarry revealed the murder scene, strewn with blood stained rocks and the empty bottles that Haywood had purchased from the Inn.

He was therefore charged with murder.


Haywood came to trial at the Shire Hall in Hereford on the 28th of November before Mr. Justice Bigham.  His counsel tried to put forward a defence of insanity at Haywood had spent time in the Hereford City and County Lunatic asylum.  Dr. Morrison from the asylum testified that Haywood was “an imbecile of the higher grade” and that consuming alcohol had led to temporary insanity.  Neither the judge or jury were impressed with this defence.  It took the jury just a few minutes to return a guilty verdict.


He was hanged on a gallows set up in the prison mill house by Henry Pierrepoint and John Ellis.  This would be the last hanging here and the only one in the 20th century.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs North Korea, Jan 03:  Unlike previous executions of political prisoners, the execution of Jang Song Thaek on December 12 was reportedly one of the most brutal ones ever conducted by the North Korean regime. According to a detailed account published in Wen Wei Po, a Hong Kong based Chinese newspaper, Jang Song Thaek, Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-Un’s uncle and the second most powerful man in North Korea, was stripped naked and thrown into a cage of 120 hounds who had been starved for three days. During the brutal execution, which was reportedly personally overseen by Kim Jong Un, the hounds were allowed to prey on Jang Song Thaek and five of his closest aides who also had been stripped and thrown into the cage. According to the report, the entire process lasted for about an hour by the end of which they were completely eaten up. This is called "quan je" or "execution by dogs". Political ...

WOMAN FORCED TO RUN N@KED THROUGH THE STREETS AFTER BEING CAUGHT HAVING S3X BY HER LOVER’S WIFE

WOMAN FORCED TO RUN N@KED THROUGH THE STREETS AFTER BEING CAUGHT HAVING S3X BY HER LOVER’S WIFE The Sun reported that passers-by took pictures of a woman as she desperately tried to cover her modesty. A WOMAN was forced to flee naked from her married lover’s bed after allegedly being busted naked by his WIFE. The extreme walk of shame was fully captured on camera by shocked passers-by in a packed city centre. According to a clip seen online, the redhead desperately tries to cover her modesty as she walks the streets stark naked and struggling to cover up as she walks alongside fully clothed pedestrians and crosses the road in front of a tram. Pictires have since gone viral. One eye-witness said he believed that the woman’s walk of shame was a forfeit for losing a horny bet which was ready after along dry spell. And netizen ‘Kkt’ said: “Maybe she just really wanted to have sex and simply went out on the hunt like that being completely desperate. If she was running away from her lo...

I WEPT AFTER READING THIS JUDGE'S SENTENCE ON A 15 YEAR OLD BOY...

I WEPT AFTER READING THIS JUDGE'S SENTENCE ON A 15 YEAR OLD BOY... This was a fifteen year old boy.... He was caught stealing bread from a store. On trying to escape from the hold of the guard, a shelf of the store was also broken. The judge heard the crime and asked the boy, “Did you really steal something, a loaf of bread and cheese?” The boy responded by looking down.;- “Yes.” Judge: - “Why?” Boy: - “I needed it.” Judge: - “Couldn't you have bought?” Boy: - “There was no money.” Judge: - “Take it from the family.” Boy: - “There is only a mother in the house. Sick and unemployed. Judge: - “You don't do anything?” Boy: - “Used to wash a car. When I took a day off to take care of my mother, I was fired.” Judge: - “Don’t you ask someone for help?” Boy: - “Had left the house since morning, went to about fifty (50) people, but no help; so, I decided to take this step at the very end.” When the arguments ended, the judge began to pronounce the verdict; “The theft and especially...

After Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Tragedy and Humiliation.

After Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Tragedy and Humiliation.  U.S. and Australian brutalisation of women on the Japanese mainland.   (Excerpt From Pages 66-69) All references are provided in the book itself.  “There was a far darker side to the U.S. and allied occupation of Japan, one which is little mentioned in the vast majority of histories – American or otherwise. When Japan surrendered in August 1945, mass rapes by occupying forces were expected… [despite setting up of a comfort women which recruited or otherwise trafficked desperate women to brothels] such crimes were still common and several of them were extremely brutal and resulted in the deaths of the victims. Political science professor Eiji Takemae wrote regard- ing the conduct of American soldiers occupying Japan: ‘U.S. troops comported themselves like conquerors, especially in the early weeks and months of occupation. Misbehavior ranged from black-marketeering, petty theft, reckless driving and disorderly con...

King Edward VII Love Chair

  King Edward VII (nicknamed Bertie), had a custom made ‘siege d’amour’ (or love chair), kept at the famous Le Chabanais brothel in Paris. It was built to allow him to have sex with two or more people all at the same time.  The chair was the ultimate symbol of Bertie’s voracious sexual appetite, which became a constant headache for the royal family, especially his mother, who believed him utterly untrustworthy and severely limited his Royal responsibilities as a result.  However, the more Queen Victoria disapproved, the more extravagant Bertie became in his pursuits of pleasure, the chair being the ultimate testament to his rebellious and irresponsible behaviour. The press gave him the name ‘Dirty Bertie’. It was said that his father had a word with him about his dalliances and then died shortly after their chat. Queen Victoria blamed his death on the stress brought about by “that dreadful business”, or at least a big contributing factor of it. She then arranged his marri...

True Story Of Josephine Myrtle Corbin, The Lady Born With Four Legs & Two Private Parts

True Story Of Josephine Myrtle Corbin, The Lady Born With Four Legs & Two Private Parts  Residents were curious of Josephine's rare look, so the father decided to make money from it by charging them a token to look at his four-legged daughter. When she was thirteen, Josephine travelled to different towns in the company of his father for sideshow performance which earned them a lot of money. While at a glance one could see four legs dangling beyond the hem of her dress only one pair actually belonged to her. The other set belonged to her DIPYGUS twin sister. Born in Lincoln County, TN in 1868 and spending most of her childhood in Blount Council, AL - where she can be found in the 1880 census, her condition was incredibly rare. The tiny body of her twin was only fully developed from the waist down and even then it was malformed - tiny and possessing only three toes but she was able to control the limbs of her sister but was unable to use them to for walking and she herself had di...

ON THIS DAY, AUGUST 31, 2016, A SUGGESTIVE PICTURE OF A BRIDE HAVING A LAST S*XUAL

ON THIS DAY, AUGUST 31, 2016, A SUGGESTIVE PICTURE OF A BRIDE HAVING A LAST S*XUAL On this day, August 31, 2016, a suggestive picture of a bride having a last s*xual encounter with her ex-boyfriend a short distance away from her wedding venue was emerged. A Facebook user, Bukola Atupa Ajeigbe shared an odd photo of an unnamed bride preparing to be bonked from behind in doggy fashion by an ex boyfriend shockingly on the day of her wedding with her full outfit on. After-thoughts also have it that the picture could have been taken from a movie scene although the faces of the characters or persons are not known on the television screens...

The Battle and Ra.pe of Manila

The Battle and Ra.pe of Manila  While the Rape of Nanking in China is slowly making its way into mainstream media and educational systems, the Manila massacre is still struggling to get recognition regardless of the inexplicable inhumanity involved, matching even that of Nanking.  An American soldier in Manila rescuing a wounded Filipino girl Time: February 1945 Sources: MacArthur Archives The Japanese occupation of the Philippines' capital started after five months of fierce fighting against US forces during the early days of the Pacific War. Manila was declared an "open city" (undefended and exempt from enemy aggression) on December 26, 1941, by American General Douglas MacArthur, who vowed to return one day. His chance finally came on January 9, 1945, when MacArthur's 6th Army came ashore upon the beaches of Lingayen Bay to liberate the Philippines. General Douglas MacArthur coming ashore from an LCVP on Lingayen Gulf Blue 1 landing beach, Luzon, Philippines, 9 Jan...

WARNING! Graphic Content Below Are Frank Discussion Of Rape, Execution. Not Meant For The Weak.

WARNING! Graphic Content Below Are Frank Discussion Of Rape, Execution. Not Meant For The Weak. 'Blood oozed through the soil at grave sites. You could see the pits move, some of them were still alive': The secrets of Ukraine's shameful 'Holocaust of Bullets' killing centre where 1.6million Jews were executed . Seventy years on from the end of the Second World War the full, shocking scale of the Nazi-inspired Holocaust in Ukraine is finally being revealed - thanks to pioneering work by a French Catholic priest to research the truth of the industrial-scale killing. Around 2,000 mass graves of Jewish victims have been located where men, women and children were shot and buried by the Germans and their collaborators. But there maybe up to 6,000 more sites to uncover, with victims of this 'Holocaust of bullets' - so called because unlike in Poland and Germany where gas chambers were used as the means of slaughter - here most were summarily shot and buried nearby....

The Nanking Massacre is a devastating example of the suffering that can be inflicted on a defeated or weak country during times of war.

The Nanking Massacre is a devastating example of the suffering that can be inflicted on a defeated or weak country during times of war. It serves as a reminder of the importance of working to prevent conflicts and protect civilians in times of conflict. It is also a testament to the resilience and strength of the human spirit, as many survivors of the massacre were able to rebuild their lives and move forward despite the unimaginable horrors they had experienced. The Nanking Massacre, also known as the Nanjing Massacre, was a horrific event that took place in the Chinese city of Nanjing in December 1937, during the Second Sino-Japanese War. After the Japanese Imperial Army invaded and captured the city, they carried out a campaign of mass murder, rape, and destruction that lasted for several weeks. It is estimated that as many as 300,000 Chinese civilians and prisoners of war were killed during this time. The Nanking Massacre is a tragic example of the suffering that can be inflicted o...