Skip to main content

The unthinkable punishment

 ON THIS DAY, 224 years ago 


June 20th 1798 





At his camp at Longraigue, near Horetown in south Wexford, before the rising of the sun, General Sir John Moore, was organising his force of 1,300 Crown soldiers for the assault of Wexford Town. However, he was to wait for his reinforcements from Duncannon Fort and would not proceed without them. His opponents, Fr. Philip Roche and Tom Cloney, encamped upon Forth Mountain, were somewhat positive to take the field of battle.


 After their disastrous and hasty retreat from Lacken Hill, the day before, the Southern Division had been rewarded with some refreshing and badly needed armaments from the commissaries at Wexford Town and also welcomed hundreds of their former comrades, who had mutinied since the Battle of New Ross, back to their ranks. There was no resentment. They would surely prove their honour to dear Wexford once again. 


At dawn, some welcoming reinforcements amalgamated into Roche and Cloney's force. A positive sight considering they had suffered mutiny since June 5th. Cloney briefly described within his memoirs the insurgent marksmen being around 350 in number. He encouraged their segregation from the columns of marching pikemen and planned to use them in four frontal attacking lines to stem Moore's ranks. As they marched towards Moore's camp, some unnecessary diversions occurred which would reflect deeply upon the result of the day. 


John Henry Colclough of Tintern, marched ahead of his column of men. They had honour to regain after their strange disappearance from the walls of Ross when their comrades were spilling blood by the thousands. Colclough had a lot to answer for and unfortunately, no account survives of why he decided to retreat so early in the battle at Ross. However, this was fifteen days later and now confusion was the enemy of the insurgents. 


Cloney relates further in his memoirs that Colclough, although not mentioned by name, decided amongst himself to march away from the main insurgent army. When questioned by Cloney to answer for his actions, Colclough confidently stated that his battalion of rebels were marching to a location between Moore's camp and New Ross, in order to cut off any retreating Crown Forces. 


Cloney acknowledged Colclough's confidence in Fr. Philip Roche's ability to beat Moore's force but he couldn't stop Colclough's decision and away marched several hundred badly needed rebels. The rising dust alerted Moore of the approaching insurgents. The Battle of Goff's Bridge was about to begin. 


Cloney returned to find the insurgent army in a logistical mess. Moore's elite company of 60th Rifles picked off insurgents as they started to cross the river, however, the positivity of battle and good discipline encouraged the rebel's progress. Having reached Goff's Bridge, Cloney relates in his memoirs that the road to Foulke's Mill and the road running north through the woods of Horetown House were crowded with insurgents, hampering Cloney's time in finding the direction that Fr. Philip Roche was leading battle plans from. Cloney gathered his Bantry battalions and made for Tottenham Green. 


It was here that Cloney learned of Fr. Roche's frontal attack upon Crown Forces at Stoneenrath Cross. By this time, General Moore's left flanking companies had extended some distance and Cloney found himself separated from the main body by these infiltrating bodies of Crown troops. The heavy exchange of musketry and the air void of any wind created a choking mist of battle smoke, which encouraged confusion and desertion amongst the insurgents. 


The insurgents launched their attack upon the artillery but were heavily repulsed by disciplined lines of Crown muskets and severe blasts of grapeshot. Moore's company of Yagers, an elite company of riflemen, picked off insurgents at longer ranges. The battle was intense at some places, with dozens upon dozens of insurgent bodies heaped upon the field. 


Major Aylmer of the Light Infantry marched against a large body of rebels that threatened Moore's left flank. Some '98 historians believe these insurgents to be Colclough's hesitant battalion. 


Aylmer was fearful of the hundreds of pikemen and insurgent musketeers within the dense wood. Several exchanges of musket fire resulted in the wood becoming dangerously misty, however Aylmer would not strike against them. Major Daniel was dispatched by Moore to reinforce Aylmer's position with two light companies of soldiers and a field gun, however, Moore's left flank became increasingly alarming as hundreds of pikemen harassed his lines, causing various retreating of Crown forces. 


After some intense battle negotiations of musket fire and pike charges, Moore eventually overcame his opponents and his Hessian Corps cleaned up the stragglers. Hundreds of insurgents lay dead upon the fields around Goff's Bridge and the peripheries of Horetown Wood. Rebel casualties are unknown for this battle as many who participated were not long term insurgents. The numbers may be close to 400. General Moore lost ten soldiers and forty-five injured, including Major Daniel who would later die from the bullet wounds be received whilst relieving Aylmer. By 8pm, the insurgents broke and fled in all directions, with the remnants retreating back to Three Rocks. 


The Southern Division of the Republican Army of Wexford was now broken and beaten.

In Northern Wexford, Needham's force manoeuvred from the town of Gorey in a southerly direction, towards the village of Oulart, on the slopes of the Wexford insurgents first major battle victory. Atrocities occurred at all quarters and mercy was rarely given. Anthony Perry, Garrett Byrne and Edward Fitzgerald of Newpark led the Northern Division steadily along the narrow roads towards Enniscorthy, but was hampered by the thousands of refugees who straggled behind. 


At some stages, brief clashes occurred with Crown Force scouts, highlighting how close they were being followed. The British manoeuvres were being quickly established. General Duff reached Scarawalsh Bridge, three miles north of Enniscorthy, whilst General Loftus marched through Camolin to Ferns and rendezvoused with General Lake and Dundas once more. By evening, this amalgamation had embraced Duff's force and they all settled upon the grazing lands of Soloman Richard's farm at Solsborough. Word was sent to General Needham at McAuley's Hotel at Oulart to proceed for the southern end of the insurgent camp, for tomorrow, battle would commence. General Johnson was camped on the western fringes of Enniscorthy.


 It would be a surrounding job. Close to midnight, the Northern Division reached their destination and joined forces with Fr. Mogue Kearns and Fr. Clinch. Myles Byrne would later state in his memoirs, the lack of enthusiasm of creating any makeshift defences during their tenure on the hill. 


With the distant sound of cannon echoing from the country behind Forth Mountain, the people of Wexford were in a frantic state, praying that Fr. Roche's boys would win the day at General Moore's camp. Only time would tell about their fate. The disciplined and dedicated pikemen, the John Street Corps, under Richard "Dick Monk" Monaghan, who had kept order upon the streets were now gone to fight under Roche and Cloney and in their absence lawlessness started to creep in. 


Multiple buildings across the town were being used as makeshift jailhouses for loyalist prisoners. The notorious Tom Dixon, his wife, "Yella" Madge Dixon and their consortium of what can be best described as an apolitical town rabble, who undedicated to the cause of liberty and religious brotherhood, came out to wreck havoc, under their black flag with bold white initials "MWS" - "Murder Without Sin". "If Wexford is to fall, then let's take a few of them with us" they would have chanted as they slogged heavy gulps of whiskey beside the harbour. They would've heard of the Massacre at Scullabogue and probably congratulated such a gruesome event, for now they wanted another. Wexford Town would see another of what Myles Byrne later described as "those abominable cold blooded reprisals."


The loyalist prisoners were no longer safe. Dixon's mob encouraged pandemonium amongst the townspeople, playing with their fears and exaggerating what the loyalists would do if the British regained control of the town. He got his pass in a sense and without any resistance, Dixon's mob made straight for the jails, unbeknownst to the town leadership of Matthew Keugh, William Kearney and Bagenal Harvey. Blood would be spilt today. 

Mock trials were established to try and legitimise their intended murders. The loyalists were dragged through the streets towards Wexford Bridge, tried and convicted within minutes and gruesomely piked by several of the mob, such as Thomas Cleary, Hugh Rooney and Stephen Furlong, who lifted them with the pikes until they died or fell unconscious, and then heaved the remains into the harbour below. This unbelievable massacre took place over three to four hours without much opposition. However, Esmond Kyan, the recuperating insurgent artillery commander, who had been wounded at Arklow, saw the commotion and saved several lives. The Wexford priest, Fr. Corrin also played an influential part by putting a stop to the travesty before it was completely stopped by Edward Roche, who returned to find such an act of disgust occurring during his absence from the town. It is stated that ninety-eight loyalists were piked to death upon the bridge of Wexford. Men were dying for their country at this moment and this was occurring behind their backs. Where was Harvey and Keugh? No one knows. Some speculate they knew of what was occurring but because of their hostile relationship with Dixon and his cronies, they remained out of sight. 


The 1798 Rebellion Casualty Database has tried to amass the full numerical list of those who succumbed on Wexford Bridge on June 20th. 

This list includes: 

Thomas Aiken, Private Samuel Atkin of the Wexford Cavalry, Philip Bacon, William Baubier, Peter and Robert Burrell of Mulrankin, 

John Byrne, Thomas Cavenagh, John and William Clarke, John Codd of Davidstown, Captain William Cox of Taghmon Cavalry, Thomas Crane, Thomas Crowe and Private David Dalton of the Enniscorthy Cavalry; Private William Daniel of the Wexford Militia, John Edwards, Thomas Finn of Killimuck, John Gibson, Jonas Gurley of Wexford Town, William Harrison, John Hatchell of Wexford Town, Abraham Henesy, William Hore of Harperstown, Private John McCoy of the Taghmon Cavalry, John Morton and Private Francis Plummer of the Enniscorthy Infantry; John Radford, John Radford Jr, Nathaniel Radford, William Radford, Private Middleton Robson of the Wexford Cavalry, Anthony Thackaberry, John Smyth, George Tully, Edward Turner, J.P., Richard Whitney of New Ross, ? Kellett and William Kennedy. 


Other casualties of atrocities that took place on June 20th included the murder of two elderly men, John Grimes and Michael Prendergast, upon Ballyboley Hill, near Enniscorthy, by Needham's cavalry scouts. John Laffan of Monageer, is also recorded as dying, aged 34 years. Private Henry Kinch, a yeoman from Hunter Gowan's Wingfield Cavalry, was assassinated by insurgents in northern Wexford whilst Private William Willis of the Newtownbarry Yeomanry Corps was executed upon Vinegar Hill, before the arrival of the Northern Division. 


Little is known of the whereabouts of Tom and Madge Dixon after these atrocities. Some evidence points them to have later participated in the Kildare and Meath theatre of the Rebellion before completely disappearing from record. Various stories detail that they emigrated to the USA, after things quietened down. 

Today, when some people think of the 1798 Rebellion in County Wexford, they might think of glorious battles, won or lost, whether their ancestor possibly shed blood or had fought for the Crown. Others will think of the despicable atrocities at Scullabogue and Wexford Bridge. It seems, because they were so well documented in the aftermath of the rebellion, courtesy of trial transcripts and loyalist propagandist writers, these atrocities take precedence over larger bloody atrocities such as Gibbet Rath, the town of Killala and the Kilcumney and Newtownmountkennedy Massacres. It was these two major atrocities in Wexford which would help drive a wedge between the religions of Ireland for many years and also help darken the positive and enlightened views of the United Irishmen and Irish Republicanism. Regardless, these murders were shambolic and unnecessary and a dark stain upon the glory and honour that the pikemen and women of Wexford, Kildare, Antrim, Mayo, Leitrim, Down, Meath, Carlow and Wicklow had amassed through their bravery and sacrifice.


At nightfall, as the soldiers established their camp at Solsborough, they watched in wonder at the magnificent sight before their eyes; over 20,000 people from Wexford, Wicklow and in some cases beyond, gathered around their camp fires upon the hill and sloping fields of Vinegar Hill. The insurgent council of war was initiated. William Barker and Mogue Kearns would hold back Johnson's troops within the town, whilst the remainder of the force would penetrate Lake's army. Tomorrow, the fate of Wexford was to be decided. 


©️ C. O’Rourke, 2022


Image 1 - The Cruikshank illustration showing the Massacre on Wexford Bridge, 20 June 1798.

Image 2 - Another illustration showing how the massacre was carried out.

Image 3 - The Battle of Foulkesmills / Horetown

Image 4 - Major-General Sir John Moore

Comments

  1. I still play the song on my banjo from The Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem called, " Kelly, the Boy from Killane" which references much of this area.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

We can do better!

Popular posts from this blog

Mazzatello Method Of Execution (crushing of the head with AXE)

Mazzatello Method Of Execution (crushing of the head with AXE)  Mazzatello: crushing of the head with AXE  (abbreviated mazza) was a method of capital punishment used by the Papal States from the late 18th century to 1870.  The method was named after the implement used in the execution: a large, long-handled mallet or pole-ax. The condemned would be led to a scaffold in a public square of Rome, accompanied by a priest (the confessor of the condemned); the platform also contained a coffin and the masked executioner, dressed in black.  A prayer would first be said for the condemned’s soul. Then, the mallet would be raised, and swung in the air to gain momentum, and then brought down on the head of the prisoner, similar to a contemporary method of slaughtering cattle in stockyards.  Because this procedure could merely stun the condemned rather than killing him instantly, the throat of the prisoner would then be slit with a knife. DEEDLY RELATED POST The Robe and Ax...

The capture of brave Russian officer Rosinski

The capture of brave Russian officer Rosinski This is a shocking image and I apologize in advance for sharing it, but here’s one that truly got to me… in Belarus, 1918, after WWI had already ended, the brave Russian officer Rosinski was captured by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks tortured the captain, likely to get information out of the man, which he bravely refused to give. After that, they simply continued with the torture out of some sick sense of innate cruelty. He was ‘the enemy’ and he was at their mercy, so they brutally murdered their captive. The brave captain was emasculated. And anally impaled on a tree branch. All this while still alive. Alfred Savoir, the man who published the picture and was an eye witness to the death of the brave military officer, described "M. B.", who ordered this atrocity, thus: I knew him not long ago; he was a charming teenager with an ironic wit and joker. He was rubbed with French culture, he admired the novels of Barres and he quot...

15 Most Brutal Rape Punishments Around The World.

15 Most Brutal Rape Punishments Around The World. Rape is considered the most offensive crime in every society. Rape victims are often looked down in the society and had to suffer mental torture without any fault of her/him. This horrific impact of physical and mental assault often ruin the life of a victim. Different governments across the globe came up with strong laws against sexual assault to make their country a safer place for their citizen and to make sure no one who indulged in this heinous crime could roam free. Here are the most brutal rape punishments of different countries around the world. In China, The meritocratic leadership punishes the rapist straight away with a death sentence and in some scenarios rapist are also punished by the mutilation of their genitals. 2. Iran In Iran, the rapist is either hanged or shot to death in public. Sometimes the guilty escapes the death penalty by the premission from the victim but is still liable for 100 lashes or life imprisonm...

During World War II, millions of people were sent to concentration camps, including women.

During World War II, millions of people were sent to concentration camps, including women. Women in concentration camps were subjected to brutal treatment and often faced more severe conditions than their male counterparts. The conditions in the camps were inhumane, and women were often subjected to forced labor, starvation, and medical experiments. Women were treated differently in concentration camps than men. They were often separated from their families, forced to perform hard labor, and subjected to sexual abuse. Women who were pregnant were also subjected to harsh conditions and medical experimentation. Many women were killed, either as part of the genocide or because they were deemed too weak to continue working. One of the most notorious concentration camps where women were held was Auschwitz-Birkenau. There, women were subjected to forced labor, starvation, and medical experimentation. Many were killed in gas chambers or through other forms of execution. The camp was designe...

King Edward VII Love Chair

  King Edward VII (nicknamed Bertie), had a custom made ‘siege d’amour’ (or love chair), kept at the famous Le Chabanais brothel in Paris. It was built to allow him to have sex with two or more people all at the same time.  The chair was the ultimate symbol of Bertie’s voracious sexual appetite, which became a constant headache for the royal family, especially his mother, who believed him utterly untrustworthy and severely limited his Royal responsibilities as a result.  However, the more Queen Victoria disapproved, the more extravagant Bertie became in his pursuits of pleasure, the chair being the ultimate testament to his rebellious and irresponsible behaviour. The press gave him the name ‘Dirty Bertie’. It was said that his father had a word with him about his dalliances and then died shortly after their chat. Queen Victoria blamed his death on the stress brought about by “that dreadful business”, or at least a big contributing factor of it. She then arranged his marri...

CLIFFORD HOYT: THE MAN WHO HAS SEEN HELL

CLIFFORD HOYT: THE MAN WHO HAS SEEN HELL I immediately make a premise. Many Paranormal groups report news similar to the one I am about to publish, about a certain Harry Hoyt, aged 31, who died in 1999 a few days after having an accident from which he woke up saying he saw Hell (and they put a scene from the movie “Hellraiser 2” as a photo). Well, what I found in my research is very different, although the common thread is the same. So it's up to you to decide which version is the right one (assuming one of the two is true). Let's go to the facts. The protagonist is Clifford Hoyt (not Harry: Harry Hyot is an American filmmaker to me), 31 who suffered serious injuries in a car accident due to icy asphalt in 1999, on his way home after a long day at work in Maryland. . He remained in a coma for a few hours and when he regained consciousness, he revealed to the nurse that he was looking after him that he had been sucked into a vortex that led him straight to Hell. He told of the p...

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs

Jong Sang Thaek’s brutal execution: Stripped naked and eaten alive by Dogs North Korea, Jan 03:  Unlike previous executions of political prisoners, the execution of Jang Song Thaek on December 12 was reportedly one of the most brutal ones ever conducted by the North Korean regime. According to a detailed account published in Wen Wei Po, a Hong Kong based Chinese newspaper, Jang Song Thaek, Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-Un’s uncle and the second most powerful man in North Korea, was stripped naked and thrown into a cage of 120 hounds who had been starved for three days. During the brutal execution, which was reportedly personally overseen by Kim Jong Un, the hounds were allowed to prey on Jang Song Thaek and five of his closest aides who also had been stripped and thrown into the cage. According to the report, the entire process lasted for about an hour by the end of which they were completely eaten up. This is called "quan je" or "execution by dogs". Political ...

Colombian Necktie method of execution

❗❗WARNING: GRAPHICS Methods of Execution: Colombian Necktie A Colombian necktie is a method of execution where the victim’s throat is slashed (with a knife or other sharp object) and their tongue is pulled out through the open wound.  It was a frequent method of killing during the Colombian history period called La Violencia that started in 1948 after the leader Jorge Eliecer Gaitan was murdered. It was performed on enemies as psychological warfare meant to scare and intimidate those who later encountered the body.  Others have tried to ascribe the method to their nationality dubbing the Colombian necktie as the Italian necktie, Sicilian necktie, Cuban necktie, Slovakian necktie,and less frequently, Mexican necktie. Source: wikipedia Nightmare Brewing - Colombian Necktie  7.2% Gose Soured on Colombian Mangoes, with Lulo, Soursop and Colombian Lime zest. Spanning over five decades, the Colombian Civil War has raged on with a bloody history of violent clashes, assassination...

Abu Ghraib Torture Photos

Abu Ghraib Torture Photos The set of pictures I have chosen to review are from Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. They gained media attention in 2003/04 due to shocking conditions and acts of torture committed by American troops. Sabrina Harman, one of the soldiers featured in the pictures, took the majority of questionable photographs as she found it hard to believe what she was seeing.  It raises an ethical question of whether the photographer should intervene? Harman and other troops have made reference to knowing what they were doing was wrong yet continued without question. It becomes difficult to say if the photographers were complicit with what occurred or whether they took the photos to try to enact change. One of the reasons I find the images particularly shocking is how little I had heard of these incidents before researching them. Since Vietnam, pictures taken from battle zones are often greeted with a heavy media backlash and protest in America. This is mainly due to the relati...

Frank Discussion Of Rape And Other Atrocities Committed During War.

WARNING! PHOTO BELOW ARE NOT MET FOR THE WEAK HEART. Please note: The following subject matter is of immense importance, but could be difficult to read. There is a Frank Discussion Of Rape And Other Atrocities Committed During War. After entering a large museum in one of the world’s most ancient cities and the former capital of the Chinese empire, Nanking—or Nanjing as it’s known today—my 18-year-old daughter Sophia and I walked over a glass walkway that allowed us to look down 10 feet of earth and observe an ancient footpath. Lights highlighted the ground under the glass while the room we were in was dark.  To our right hung numerous photographs on a black wall showing Japanese soldiers slaughtering Chinese citizens in December 1937 revealed by individual lights, the types one sees on art museum paintings. Dead babies, severed heads, piles of bodies on Yangtze River banks, and helpless prisoners of war were all documented there by photographs taken by the perpetrators themselve...